Bone, Shell & Object Divination · The Living Archive
Shang Oracle Bones: The Questions a Kingdom Left Behind
- Tradition:
- Shang dynasty divination
- Context:
- China
- Period:
- Late Shang dynasty
A kingdom's written record can preserve more than its victories. It can preserve its worries.
Will a birth go well? Will an attack succeed? Is an ancestor responsible for trouble? What should be done about a threatened harvest?
Questions like these survive in late Shang oracle-bone inscriptions. They bring us unusually close to people who lived more than three thousand years ago, even as the religious and political world around those people differs considerably from our own.
The material is equally remarkable. Much of this record was written on cattle shoulder blades and the lower shells of turtles, surfaces used in consultations in which heat produced cracks to be interpreted.
When and where?
Surviving late Shang oracle bones are closely associated with Anyang in present-day Henan, China. One inscribed fragment in the Smithsonian's National Museum of Asian Art is dated approximately 1250–1050 BCE and identified with the late Shang Anyang period. Its small size, about three and a half centimeters high, is a reminder that a surviving record may be a fragment of a much larger object.1
Columbia University Libraries holds a shoulder blade dated approximately 1300–1050 BCE. Its account places the questions within the concerns of rulers: agriculture, important marriages, and the sacrifices through which the world was understood to be ordered.2
These dates describe particular surviving objects. They should not be mistaken for a precise founding date for every Chinese practice of bone divination.
How the consultation worked
Columbia's translated source introduction describes prepared pits in bone or shell, the application of heat, and interpretation by a king or diviner. A consultation could leave several kinds of writing: the proposition being tested, the reading of the cracks, and sometimes a later account of what occurred. Participants sought to understand ancestral will, the intentions of the high deity Di, and a course of action.3
We can distinguish those parts without turning them into a rigid template that every inscription follows. A proposed outcome, an interpretation, and a recorded event are different kinds of information. Some surviving records contain more than others.
That distinction makes the inscriptions compelling to read. They can preserve both an expectation and what someone subsequently chose to record about it.
A royal birth, and the judgment attached to it
One translated inscription concerns Lady Hao, a consort of King Wu Ding. It records a favorable proposition about her childbearing, the king's interpretations concerning possible birth days, and a later notice that she gave birth after thirty-one days. The child was a girl, and the record evaluates the outcome negatively.4
The detail is personal and political at once. Someone was waiting for a child. The court cared about the timing and result. The written assessment also exposes a hierarchy of value attached to the child's sex.
Reading the episode today involves encountering that judgment rather than adopting it. It tells us something about the expectations expressed by the people who made the inscription. It does not make a daughter an unfavorable birth.
The example also shows why oracle bones are so much more than a collection of mysterious marks. They preserve human concerns and the assumptions through which those concerns were interpreted.
War and divine assistance
Other translated inscriptions concern military action. Columbia's warfare selection includes a question about whether the king, acting with a named general, would receive assistance in an attack. Another consultation asks whether an enemy's actions are connected with Di.5
The questions place military strategy within a religious understanding of power. A ruler needed to think about adversaries and forces available for a campaign, while also considering the possibility of divine support or opposition.
For the historian, that combination is revealing. Religion is part of the language in which a political decision is framed. The consultation is embedded in the affairs of the kingdom.
Ancestors with continuing influence
Inscriptions in Columbia's general selection ask whether deceased royal relatives are responsible for harm. Some frame related possibilities in opposing propositions.3
This is a different relationship with ancestors from simply remembering a family's past. The dead are approached as continuing participants in the fortunes of the living. The court's questions make that relationship concrete, naming particular figures and possible effects.
The paired propositions also help us understand the consultation's intellectual shape. The process could consider alternatives, even though its way of establishing an answer depended on a religious interpretation of cracks.
Why the writing matters
Columbia describes the inscriptions as the earliest surviving written records of Chinese civilization and notes their scholarly recognition beginning in 1899.3 That modern recognition gave researchers access to a body of writing created within the religious and administrative concerns of an ancient court.
There is a double history here: the original consultations and the later work of identifying and reading their remains. A shoulder blade can belong first to a ritual procedure, then to a buried deposit, and eventually to the history of scholarship and collecting.
The resulting archive is selective. Its strong focus on the court leaves much of the wider population less directly represented.2
What they left behind is nevertheless extraordinary. The bones allow us to meet a kingdom through the things its rulers could not take for granted: children, food, health, military success, and the goodwill of powers beyond themselves.
Key terms
- Plastron (Bone, shell & object divination)
- The lower part of a turtle's shell.
- Scapula (Bone, shell & object divination)
- A shoulder blade.
- Provenance (Bone, shell & object divination)
- An object's documented history of ownership or custody. Provenance information may be incomplete.
Sources
- 1.Oracle bone fragment, inscribedSmithsonian National Museum of Asian Art
S2012.9.465, ca. 1250–1050 BCE. Object place, dimensions and period.
Back to text ↑ - 2.Jewels in Her Crown: Oracle BoneColumbia University Libraries
Shoulder blade dated ca. 1300–1050 BCE and court concerns.
Back to text ↑ - 3.Oracle Bone Inscriptions of the Late Shang DynastyColumbia University, Asia for Educators
Translated excerpts from Sources of Chinese Tradition, Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom, eds., 2nd ed., vol. 1, 1999. Heat-based procedure, ancestors, Di, propositions and modern scholarly recognition.
Back to text ↑ - 4.Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of the Late Shang Dynasty: On ChildbearingColumbia University, Asia for Educators
Translated excerpts from Sources of Chinese Tradition, 1999. The Lady Hao consultation and recorded assessment.
Back to text ↑ - 5.Oracle Bone Inscriptions of the Late Shang Dynasty: On WarfareColumbia University, Asia for Educators
Translated excerpts from Sources of Chinese Tradition, 1999. Military consultations.
Back to text ↑
Related reading
- Bones, Shells and Objects: How a Cast Becomes a Reading
- Southern African Bone Casting: Ancestors, Calling and the Meaning of the Fall
- Cowries: From Circulating Wealth to Sacred Speech
- Chokwe Basket Divination: A World of Meaning in Miniature
- Knucklebones, Dice and Lots: A History of Casting for Answers
- How Objects Become Symbols: Memory, Myth and Material Meaning
Conversation
Loading comments…
